DOI: https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.3.19.2018.136404

Long-term results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibial flexor tendon autograft

M.L. Golovakha, I.V. Didenko, W. Orljanski

Abstract


Background. Damage to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is one of more severe injuries of the knee joint. An accurate knowledge of anatomy, biomechanics and mechanisms of damage to the knee joint and its ligamentous apparatus is fundamental in the diagnosis, reconstruction and subsequent treatment. Data about PCL trauma are very variable. Such damages occur much more often than they are suspected. This is explained by the fact that PCL ruptures are not very common in clinical practice, so they are missed, and patients only years later are referred for pain in the hip and patella, as well as pain sensations in the medial knee. The method of choice in PCL reconstruction is reparative surgeries using single­ or two­bundle graft. Regardless of chosen technique of reconstruction, the most important factor for the functional result is the positioning of PCL graft. Controversy about the method of PCL plasty is determined by the absence of consensus on the most acceptable technique and low specific weight of results with complete restoration of knee joint stability. Objective: based on the analysis of functional and radiological results, as well as complications, to evaluate the efficiency of the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibial flexor tendon autograft by the transtibial method. Materials and methods. Between 2004 and 2015, 47 patients (38 men and 9 women) were operated for acute or chronic instability of PCL. This study includes both isolated PCL reconstructions and combined multiligament reparative surgeries. Revision operations were not performed. In 7 (14.89 %) cases, there were isolated ruptures of PCL, and in 40 (85.11 %) — combined injuries. In 23 (48.94 %) patients, ligament rupture was a result of sport injuries, in 12 (25.53 %) — road accidents and in 12 (25.53 %) cases — other factors. The surgeries were performed arthroscopically using the standard technique of channel drilling: the femoral — through the anterolateral access and the tibial — transtibially. A graft was used from the semitendinous and gracilis muscles (one bundle). If there was a combined damage to the PCL with a rupture of the posterolateral angle of the knee joint, then we used LaPrade technique. Five patients (10.64 %) had previously undergone knee joint surgery: in 2 cases (4.46 %), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was restored; in one case (2.13 %) — ACL, PCL and medial collateral ligament; in 2 cases (4.46 %) — PCL. Results. Subjective evaluation showed the following positive results: 23 out of 27 patients who were examined in the long­term period were satisfied with the treatment outcome. The overwhelming number of individuals did not have significant pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale, and 81.15 % of the patients were satisfied with the result and were ready to undergo surgery again if necessary. The objective data of Lysholm and Gillquist functional scales — on ave­rage 76.75 ± 17.18 (38–100) points, Tegner — on average 5 (1–9), KOOS — 78.14 ± 19.78 (0–100), IKDC A­2 (12.5 %), B­8 (50 %), C­4 (25 %), D­2 (12.5 %) indicate a significant improvement in the function of the knee joints. X­ray evaluation showed the progression of osteoarthritis. Conclusions. The surgical treatment of PCL injuries with tibial flexor tendon autograft using the transtibial technique of drilling a channel in the tibia is an effective method that has allowed obtaining positive treatment outcomes.


Keywords


knee joint; reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament; arthroscopic technique using Retro Drill®; tibial flexor tendon autograft; functional results

References


Clinical diagnosis of back instability of the knee joint in athletes / A.Zh. Abdrakhmanov // Modern problems of sports traumatology and orthopedics: Tez. doc. sci. Conf. -M., 1997.- P. 7.

Damage of posterior cruciate ligament / M.L. Golovakha , W.Orljanski, K.P. Benedetto - Zaporozhye: Prosvita, 2017. – P.92.

Surgical correction of cruciate and collateral ligaments of the knee joint in the acute period of trauma: Clinical and experimental research// V.E. Dubrov // abstract dis. Dr. med. sciences: M., 2003. P. 48.

Biomechanics of post-traumatic instability of the knee joint. // G.P. Kotelnikov, G.V. Kuropatkin, M.V. Pivovarov// Biomechanical studies in traumatology and orthopedics. - M., 1988 - P. 13-16.

Bergfeld J.A., McAllister D.R., Parker R.D., Valdevit A.D., Kambic H.E. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2001 March-April: p. 129-136

Campbell R.B., Torrie A., Hecker A., Sekiya J.K. Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007 October: p. 1731 - 1738.

Christel P. Basic principles for surgical reconstruction of the PCL in chronic posterior knee instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrose. 2003 September: p. 289-296.

Cury Rde P., Mestriner M.B., Kaleka C.C., Severino N.R., de Oliveira V.M., Camargo O.P. Double-bundle PCL reconstruction using autogenous quadriceps tendon and semitendinous graft: surgical technique with 2-year follow-up clinical results. Knee. 2014 June: p. 763-768.

Jordan S.S., Campbell R.B., Sekiya J.K. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a new arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle technique. Sports Med Arthrose. 2007 December: p. 176-183.

LaPrade R.F., Johansen S., Agel J., Risberg M. A., Moksnes H., Engebretsen L. Outcomes of an Anatomic Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:16-22 d doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.00474

Logan M., Williams A., Lavelle J., Gedroyc W., Freeman M. The effect of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on knee kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2004 December: p. 1915-1922.

Margheritini F., Frascari Diotallevi F., Mariani P.P. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction usäng an arthroscopic femoral inlay technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrose. 2011 December: p. 2033-2035.

Mariani P.P., Margheritini F. Full arthroscopic inlay reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrose. 2006 November: p. 1038-1044.

Markolf K.L., Zemanovic J.R., McAllister D.R. Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 April: p, 518-524

Montgomery S.R., Johnson J.S., McAllister D.R., Petrigliano F.A. Surgicai management of PCL injuries: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 June: p. 115-123.

Petersen W., Zantop T. Biomechanik des hinteren Kreuzbandes und der hinteren Instability. Arthroskopie. 2006 August: p. 207-214.

Russe K., Schulz M.S., Strobel M.J. Epidemiologie der hinteren Kreuzbandverletzung. Arthroskopie. 2006 August: p. 215-220

Salata M.J., Sekiya J.K. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction: a surgical technique that may influence rehabilitation. Sports Health. 2011 January: p. 52-58.

Strobel M.J., Weiler A. Therapie der chronischen HKB-Lasion. Arthroskopie. 2006 August: p. 243-257.

Weiler A., Schmeling A., Jung T.M. Management der akuten HKB-Verletzung. Arthroskopie. 2006 August: p. 229-242.




Copyright (c) 2018 TRAUMA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

© Publishing House Zaslavsky, 1997-2018

 

   Seo анализ сайта