Differentiated methods for surgical treatment of patients with facial nerve injury consequences

I.V. Tsymbaliuk, I.B. Tretyak, O.O. Gatskiy, B.M. Luzan, T.I. Petriv, V.I. Tsymbaliuk


Background. The symmetry of the face is extremely important for everyone for full interaction and comfortable existence in society. As a result, damage to the facial nerve (FN) becomes a serious problem for a patient, causing several negative consequences in many aspects of a patient’s life. Facial muscle paralysis causes emotion inhibition, facial expressions, impedes full communication, smiles, and negatively affects a patient’s vision. The purpose of the study is to investigate the results of differentiated surgical treatment of facial nerve injury. Materials and methods. Between 1998 and 2018, 199 surgical procedures were performed using various methods of surgical treatment of the effects of FN damage — dynamic and static. Dynamic methods of surgical treatment of facial nerve neuropathy (FNN) were applied in 173 cases (86.9 %), static — in 26 cases (13.1 %). The mean age was 38.2 ± 1.1 years. There were 67.2 % women and 32.8 % of males. The severity of FNN was assessed on a House-Brackmann scale. Patients underwent surgery within 1 month to 15 years after injury (median 7.0 ± 5.9 months). Results. In a total of 199 cases, the median postoperative FN function on the House-Brackmann scale was 3.000 ± 0.067 points. Good recovery rates of FN function (up to II–III points on the House-Brackmann scale) were observed in 160 patients (80.41 %), satisfactory (up to IV–V points on the House-Brackmann scale) — in 39 patients (19.59 %). Analyzing separately the results of surgical treatment by the nerve transfer methods, we obtained the following indicators of FN function recovery. In groups 1–4, nerve transfer significantly improved FN function after surgery (p < 0.01; Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Test, Mann-Whitney U-test). When performing surgical treatment of patients with FN injury by the methods of nerve decompression, suture and nerve grafting, good results of function recovery were obtained in 5 (62.5 %) of 8 patients; after surgical static methods — in 6 (85.7 %) of 7 patients. The non-surgical facelift method was applied in 19 patients with the effects of FN injury after FN neurotization with different donor nerves and improved the aesthetics and facial symmetry parameters in all patients (100 %) (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Tests). Conclusions. Facial nerve neurotization with different nerve donors allows achieve good indicators of FN recovery, but for better functional results in patients with consequences of FN damage, we recommend to supplement with static methods of a non-surgical facelift, which eliminates the traditional risks and negative complications of surgical static face correction procedures.


surgical treatment; trauma; facial nerve; static methods; dynamic methods


Dong-Hee Lee Clinical Efficacy of Electroneurography in Acute Facial Paralysis. J Audiol Otol 2016;20(1):8-12

Yetiser S. Total facial nerve decompression for severe traumatic facial nerve paralysis: a review of 10 cases. Int J Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:607359. doi: 10.1155/2012/607359. Epub 2011 Nov 20. PMID: 22164173; PMCID: PMC3228390.

Цимбалюк В.І., Цимбалюк Ю.В., Дем’янов М.А., Третяк І.Б. Електростимуляція у відновному лікуванні наслідків ушкодження лицьового нерва. ШПИТАЛЬНА ХІРУРГІЯ. 2014. (1):58-60.

Biglioli F, Colombo V, Rabbiosi D, Tarabbia F, Giovanditto F, Lozza A, Cupello S, Mortini P. Masseteric-facial nerve neurorrhaphy: results of a case series. J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):312-318. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.JNS14601. Epub 2016 Apr 1. PubMed PMID: 27035172.

White H, Rosenthal E. Static and dynamic repairs of facial nerve injuries. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013 May;25(2):303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2013.02.002. Review. PubMed PMID: 23642673.

Hwang K, Suh MS, Lee SI, Chung IH. Zygomaticotemporal nerve passage in the orbit and temporal area. J Craniofac Surg. 2004 Mar;15(2):209-14. PubMed PMID: 15167230.

Hwang K, Cho HJ, Chung IH. Pattern of the temporal branch of the facial nerve in the upper orbicularis oculi muscle. J Craniofac Surg. 2004 May;15(3):373-6. PubMed PMID: 15111793.

House J.W., Brackmann D.E. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1985, 93: 146-147. DOI: 10.1177/019459988509300202

Yamada H, Hato N, Murakami S, Honda N, Wakisaka H, Takahashi H, Gyo K. Facial synkinesis after experimental compression of the facial nerve comparing intratemporal and extratemporal lesions. Laryngoscope. 2010 May;120(5):1022-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.20840. PubMed PMID: 20301199.

Hoffman WY. Reanimation of the paralyzed face. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1992 Jun;25(3):649-67. Review. PubMed PMID: 1625868.

Conley J, May M. Rehabilitation techniques for acute and long-standing facial paralysis. May M, Schaitkin BM. The Facial Nerve. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2000. Vol 1: 562-9

Vlastou C. Facial paralysis. Microsurgery. 2006. 26(4):278-87. [Medline]

Condie D, Tolkachjov SN. Facial Nerve Injury and Repair: A Practical Review for Cutaneous Surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2019 Mar;45(3):340-357. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001773. Review. PubMed PMID: 30640780.

Gekht B.M., Kasatkina L.F., Samoilov M.I., Sanadze A.G. Elektromiografiia v diagnostike nervno-myshechnyh zabolevanii. Taganrog: Izd-vo TRTU; 1997. 370 p. (in Russ.).

Tretiakova A.I. Kliniko-elektroneyromiografichna diagnostyka uragen' lyts'ovogo nerva, kryterii prognozuvannia efektyvnosti likuvannia. Ukr. visn. Psyhonevrologii. 2002;10(2)(31):79–81. (in Ukr.).

Chebotaryova L.L., Tretiakova A.I. Kliniko-electroneyromiograficheskaia diagnostika poragenii litsevogo nerva, kritetii prognoza rezul’tatov hirurgicheskogo lecheniia. Х yubil. megdunar. konf. «Informatsionnie tehnologii v medicine i ekologii»: Tr.konf. — Yalta-Gurzuf: IT+ME'. 2002:476–478. (in Russ.).

Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: principles and practice.–Ed.2.–Philadelphia: F.A.Davis Co, 1989.–710 p.

Oh S.J. Clinical Electromyography: Nerve conduction studies. Baltimore: Univer. Park Press, 1984.–519 p.

Copyright (c) 2019 TRAUMA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


© Publishing House Zaslavsky, 1997-2020


   Seo анализ сайта